<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The benefits of segmentation, part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/the-benefits-of-segmentation-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/the-benefits-of-segmentation-part-i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaila Colbin</title>
		<link>http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/the-benefits-of-segmentation-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaila Colbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/the-benefits-of-segmentation-part-i/#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>Hello there Rachel,

Thanks so much for your input. I totally agree with you.

Like most questions, this one gets more complex the more you try to scale it. So as a small business that sells maternity wear, I might leave flyers in obstetricians&#039; offices, and that would be appropriate segmentation. On the other hand, a large company in a saturated market whose shareholders demand continual growth, I might seek unfair advantage by crossing the line of that sweet spot.

The other difficulty lies in the phrase &#039;what data is available&#039;. All data needs to be collected in some way; the most basic form of segmentation would involve using only data that you collect anyway in the course of doing business. But of course that&#039;s generally not enough to make significant predictions, so further data gets collected/mined/purchased. At what point should data be off limits?

I welcome your thoughts and ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there Rachel,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your input. I totally agree with you.</p>
<p>Like most questions, this one gets more complex the more you try to scale it. So as a small business that sells maternity wear, I might leave flyers in obstetricians&#8217; offices, and that would be appropriate segmentation. On the other hand, a large company in a saturated market whose shareholders demand continual growth, I might seek unfair advantage by crossing the line of that sweet spot.</p>
<p>The other difficulty lies in the phrase &#8216;what data is available&#8217;. All data needs to be collected in some way; the most basic form of segmentation would involve using only data that you collect anyway in the course of doing business. But of course that&#8217;s generally not enough to make significant predictions, so further data gets collected/mined/purchased. At what point should data be off limits?</p>
<p>I welcome your thoughts and ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/the-benefits-of-segmentation-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/the-benefits-of-segmentation-part-i/#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re so right about the &quot;sweet spot&quot; - it&#039;s so easy to take masses of data and try to find a link between this current behaviour and some obscure predicted behaviour.  Businesses have to be realistic about what&#039;s relevant - to them and to their customer/prospect.

I guess I&#039;ve always seen segmentation as a fairly simple way of using what data is available to group customers or prospects together.  Once grouped, then making some &quot;educated guesses&quot; based on that grouping about what offers, products, services, media choices and or response mechanisms are going to be relevant to the customer and what is going to give a return to the business.

But I am still astounded at the low level of even basic segmentation that some businesses are practicing, when they have appropriate data available to be  much smarter and accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so right about the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s so easy to take masses of data and try to find a link between this current behaviour and some obscure predicted behaviour.  Businesses have to be realistic about what&#8217;s relevant &#8211; to them and to their customer/prospect.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ve always seen segmentation as a fairly simple way of using what data is available to group customers or prospects together.  Once grouped, then making some &#8220;educated guesses&#8221; based on that grouping about what offers, products, services, media choices and or response mechanisms are going to be relevant to the customer and what is going to give a return to the business.</p>
<p>But I am still astounded at the low level of even basic segmentation that some businesses are practicing, when they have appropriate data available to be  much smarter and accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
