<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy policy bites Google in the behind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/privacy-policy-bites-google-in-the-behind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/privacy-policy-bites-google-in-the-behind/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/privacy-policy-bites-google-in-the-behind/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webgenomeproject.org/privacy-policy-bites-google-in-the-behind/#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>The only reason that Viacom has put forth so far on why YouTube should be exempt from this law is that the infringement in question takes place on a "massive scale". However, there's no exemption in the law for scale, and besides, several of the cases where safe harbor has been successfully invoked involved crime on a very large scale indeed. So it seems likely based on the available precedent that Viacom will not prevail. But maybe, by getting this list, they already have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason that Viacom has put forth so far on why YouTube should be exempt from this law is that the infringement in question takes place on a &#8220;massive scale&#8221;. However, there&#8217;s no exemption in the law for scale, and besides, several of the cases where safe harbor has been successfully invoked involved crime on a very large scale indeed. So it seems likely based on the available precedent that Viacom will not prevail. But maybe, by getting this list, they already have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
