Can you be yourself at work?
One of the questions on the VortexDNA survey is about the percentage of time you feel you’re able to be yourself at work.
It’s a great question. The first time I took the survey, I was in a job that I didn’t enjoy. My natural state is one of irrepressible exuberance, and yet I spent my days sullenly biting my tongue and tamping down my spirit. As I responded to the question, I knew how much I was letting myself down.
Things have gotten a lot better since then. I work for myself. I share an office with two friends, people with whom I genuinely enjoy spending time. I choose how I spend my days and with whom I choose to do business.
Yesterday my officemates and I went out to lunch together. As we placed our orders, I spied Raf, from VortexDNA, coming in.
Now, you may have figured out from the title of this blog that I do a bit of work for VortexDNA. And I certainly would never want to jeopardize my business relationship in any way. But here’s the beauty of it: he came in, and he joined me and my friends for lunch, and the dynamic didn’t change. It didn’t grow stilted. I didn’t feel fearful that he might see the non-work side of me.
We all adjust our behavior to be appropriate for a given situation. I might swear with my friends, for example; I wouldn’t on this blog or with my mother-in-law. I choose carefully when and with whom I’m willing to engage in a conversation about politics or religion. But there’s a big difference between deciding to be appropriate and suppressing your inner nature.
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately because of the privacy issues surrounding Facebook. A lot of the complaining is from people who have carefully compartmentalized their lives and would be livid if their various personas were ever to overlap. Professional career women having their lesbianism dissected at the office water cooler. Authoritarian parents letting their kids see them as real people.
Take this quote from a New York Times article dissecting Facebook’s privacy problems:
Mr. Das, who joined Facebook on a whim after receiving invitations from friends, tried to leave after realizing that most of his co-workers were also on the site. ?I work in a small office,? he said. ?The last thing I want is people going on there and checking out my private life.?
?I did not want to be on it after junior associates at work whom I have to manage saw my stuff,? he added.
There’s nothing wrong with Mr. Das’ desire for privacy, and I’m not suggesting that our every weekend fling should be shared indiscriminately with our business colleagues. I do wonder, though, if they are two separate issues: the Facebook one, and the one in which our many lives are kept completely dis-integrated. Is there something wrong with the fact that so many of us don’t want people to see who we really are?
What do you think about it?










February 13th, 2008 at 8:20 am
I can Kaila
http://diversity.net.nz/i-am-who-i-am-are-you/2008/02/14/
Ben
February 13th, 2008 at 8:21 am
make that
http://diversity.net.nz/i-am-who-i-am-are-you/2008/02/13/
February 13th, 2008 at 8:30 am
Ah, but you’re assuming:
* people are used to not knowing who gets hear their intimate stories: WHO
* people are used to sharing via this new fandangle called “the web”: HOW
* people are used to letting their sharing happen outside of their time slice” WHEN
People are generally new to all this “life feed” malarkey.
We web-ophiles love it but then again we are weird (”cutting edge”, “early adopters” ….)
But don’t be disheartened, it has happened many, many times before - ever been to a good old corporate social club of a Friday evening - I have (at ChCh City Council) and there’s lots of the “letting the people see who we really are” going on. The difference is the (perceived) control on “who”, “how” and “when”